The Microsoft Case 10 Years Later: Antitrust and New Leading "New Economy" Firms
نویسنده
چکیده
منابع مشابه
An Economist’s Guide to U.S. v. Microsoft
W hile most antitrust cases proceed in obscurity, the case brought against Microsoft by federal and state antitrust authorities was front-page news. Much of the drama and media hype centered on the struggle between the titan of high technology, personified in Bill Gates, and the titan of government, personified in U.S. Assistant Attorney General Joel Klein. For economists and policymakers, howe...
متن کاملAn Economist's Guide to U
We analyze the central economic issues raised by U.S. v Microsoft. Network effects and economies of scale in applications programs created a barrier to entry for new operating system competitors, which the combination of Netscape Navigator and the Java programming language potentially could have lowered. Microsoft took actions to eliminate this threat to its operating system monopoly, and some ...
متن کاملHow Digital Economics Revises Antitrust Thinking.PDF
1 Antitrust thinking and enforcement have traditionally been firmly grounded in conventional economic models of monopoly and oligopoly market structures, all fully and inevitably constrained by the " laws " of demand and decreasing returns. The new economics of " digits, " encompassing those goods (like software, books, and music) that are capable of being reduced to 1's and 0's (meaning electr...
متن کاملAntitrust and the Competitive Structure of the U
National antitrust policies have potentially profound effects on global competitiveness of individual industries. Public policy interventions affecting organizational arrangements within industries, enforcement of commodity standardization, and price competition, as well as the regulation of intellectual property rights, are the major tools by which Government executes antitrust policies. This ...
متن کاملEvaluating Appropriability Defenses for the Exclusionary Conduct of Dominant Firms in Innovative Industries
In response to antitrust cases challenging the exclusionary conduct of dominant firms, some dominant firms offer an “appropriability defense”: a claim that prohibiting the challenged conduct would harm innovation by lessening the dominant firm’s return to investment in research and development (R&D) and, in consequence, undermining that firm’s incentive to innovate. This paper explains that an ...
متن کامل